PCB Thickness Guidelines

The term “PCB thickness” denotes the vertical distance separating the uppermost copper layer and the lowermost copper layer, encompassing all the insulating layers nestled in between. While this may appear as a simple parameter, its implications on the comprehensive performance, dependability, and manufacturability of electronic devices are profound. In essence, it represents the board’s vertical dimension, encapsulating all the layers that constitute its structure. These layers typically encompass copper pathways, insulating substrates, and potentially additional attributes like PCB vias and solder masks. The measurement of thickness employs units of length such as millimeters (mm) or mils (1 mil = 0.001 inch). It is considered necessary to discuss the thickness of the board and consider some technical details in the circuit design, now let’s start!

What is Standard PCB Thickness

The development of circuit boards has seen significant changes over the years. From basic board frame designs, we’ve progressed to multi-layer designs with insulated flat conductors. Today, electronic devices come in various forms, including single-layer, double-layer, and multi-layer configurations.

In the past, there was a tendency to standardize circuit board thickness. The typical PCB thickness was set at 0.063 inches or 1.57 millimeters. This choice was influenced by the thickness of plywood used in electronic devices at that time. With the advent of multi-layer PCBs, connector thickness between boards became crucial. To ensure consistency, standard copper foil layers were used as connectors at the board edges. This solidified 0.063 inches as the standard PCB thickness.

Despite this standard, actual PCB thickness varies widely, ranging from 0.008 inches to 0.240 inches. Selecting the appropriate PCB thickness depends on specific applications and requirements. For instance, in lightweight devices or those needing a slimmer profile, a thinner 1.0 mm thickness might be employed. For certain specialized purposes, a 2.0 mm (0.079 inches) or even thicker PCB could be necessary to accommodate extra components or specific mechanical demands.

PCB Substrate Thickness

A circuit board is a composition of distinct layers, with the insulating substrate forming the upper and lower sections that influence the board’s overall thickness. In its early stages, Bakelite emerged as the prevalent substrate material, yielding a board standard thickness of approximately 0.0065 inches. Technological advancements ushered in a broader array of substrate materials, transitioning from Bakelite to more sophisticated options.

As technology progressed, the repertoire of available substrate materials expanded. Copper foil layers began to embrace substrates like epoxy resin infused with glass fibers or paper fortified with phenolic resin. These modern materials boasted superior electrical and mechanical properties, resulting in noteworthy enhancements in PCB performance and functionality. Beyond functional enhancements, the shift to new substrate materials also reverberated in the board’s thickness, leading to measurements below the initial 0.0065 inches.

PCB Copper Thickness

In the realm of circuit design, engineers frequently consult the PCB copper thickness guide to align with optimal standards. Copper, with its pivotal role in facilitating conductivity and signal transmission within the PCB, holds prominence. The quantification of copper thickness is measured in ounces (oz), a metric that derives from uniformly distributing the thickness of an ounce of copper across a square foot area, culminating in 1.37 mils (equivalent to 1.37 thousandths of an inch).

Standard practice entails the fabrication of PCBs with 1 oz copper. When specifics elude designers, manufacturers exercise their discretion in adhering to this thickness. Yet, instances may arise where the flow of current necessitates more than an ounce of copper. Manufacturers then have the option to augment the copper weight or widen the traces to accommodate the heightened requirements.

However, the augmentation in copper content precipitates not only escalated costs due to increased material usage, but also reflects the intricate nature of processing thicker copper. The heightened thickness poses challenges and necessitates extended processing durations, further contributing to cost escalation. As such, achieving the right balance between copper thickness, functionality, and financial considerations is a hallmark of astute circuit design.

PCB Track Thickness

Specification of PCB trace thickness stands out as a pivotal consideration. This parameter, meticulously detailed in the designer’s Garber file, assumes a role of paramount significance in safeguarding the PCB from potential overheating or damage. The ebb and flow of electric current through copper traces, while fundamental, carries an inherent risk of generating heat that can elevate the PCB’s temperature beyond permissible thresholds.

In the dynamic interplay between current and temperature, an imperative emerges: to ascertain trace thickness that effectively manages the heat generated. The essence lies in evaluating the relationship between the current coursing through the PCB and the resultant temperature surge. A judicious balance is sought wherein the width of the trace can adeptly accommodate the temperature elevation, from the operational mean to the zenith of permissible operation. This equilibrium ensures that currents of higher magnitude traverse without detrimentally affecting the average temperature of the PCB.

The task of calculating optimal trace widths, albeit arduous, is crucial. Herein, the PCB Width Calculator steps in, alleviating the vexation. This tool empowers designers to pinpoint the precise width requisite for accommodating currents sans peril to the PCB’s integrity. The culmination of this process yields trace thickness with inner layers of expanded girth, adept at absorbing and housing heightened heat accumulation, even as outer layers expedite heat dissipation via convection.

Best practice crystallizes in the endorsement of internal trace widths for all pathways. This holistic approach attains a harmonious equilibrium, harnessing the power of precise calculations and advanced tools to guarantee PCB robustness in the face of electrical currents’ kinetic dance.

Impact of PCB Thickness on Technical Details

Mechanical Integrity

The mechanical strength of a circuit board stands as a tangible testament to its dependability. Elevated mechanical strength serves as a shield against damage or deformation resulting from mechanical impacts, thereby safeguarding the structural integrity of the circuitry. Typically, thicker PCB is associated with heightened strength due to an augmented material volume and increased rigidity. This phenomenon is elucidated by the flexural rigidity formula:

Flexural Rigidity = E * (t^3) / 12 * (1 – ν^2)

Where:

E signifies the modulus of elasticity

t represents the thickness

ν denotes Poisson’s ratio.

Thermal Management

Heat Dissipation

In applications demanding high power, effective management of heat generation is pivotal to prevent accumulation and potential component damage. An array of strategies can be employed, including the utilization of aluminum-based PCB or the consideration of adjustments to PCB board thickness parameters. The thermal advantages of aluminum-based PCB are widely acknowledged. Their superior heat dissipation capabilities stem from the remarkable combination of high thermal conductivity and low material density, attributes intrinsic to metallic substances. But what about the impact of board thickness on the circuit board’s heat dissipation capacity in the presence of component-generated heat?

The correlation between thickness and heat dissipation hinges on thermal conductivity (k) and the governing heat transfer equation:

Q = k * A * ΔT / d

Where:

Q denotes heat flow

A signifies the cross-sectional area

ΔT represents the temperature differential

d indicates the distance (PCB thickness)

In this equation, a larger d value allows for a greater passage of heat across the circuit board. This implies that a circuit board with greater thickness boasts improved heat conduction and enhanced heat dissipation capabilities.

Heat Distribution

In the realm of effective thermal management, achieving balanced heat distribution across the board is pivotal, steering clear of the concentration of heat in a specific region. How can this balance be improved through the manipulation of PCB layer thickness?

Improved Heat Pathway: The utilization of thicker boards opens up a broader avenue for thermal propagation, curbing the formation of steep temperature gradients.
Amplified Surface Area: The augmented material volume translates into an expanded surface area, fostering efficient heat conduction towards external surroundings.
Mitigated Hotspots: The increased thermal mass facilitates the dispersion of heat, mitigating the emergence of localized hotspots that can compromise component integrity.

Signal Transmission

Characteristic Impedance

Ensuring impeccable signal integrity in high-speed design hinges on upholding a consistent characteristic impedance. This impedance, central to the performance of a transmission line within a circuit, is influenced by a medley of factors, including PCB core thickness. As the core thickness increases, so does the characteristic impedance of the trace. The rationale lies in the extended reach of the signal’s electric fields into the dielectric material beneath the trace, a phenomenon accompanying the thicker dimensions. This heightened penetration of electric fields duly impacts the capacitance existing between the trace and the ground plane, subsequently influencing the characteristic impedance. Characteristic impedance (Z0) quantifies a transmission line’s resistance to electrical current flow and plays the decisive role in governing signal propagation along the trace.

For a microstrip transmission line – a variant where the trace resides atop the PCB layer, complemented by a ground plane beneath – the characteristic impedance is approximated using the subsequent expression:

Z0 = (87 / √ε_eff) * ln(5.98 * h / w + 1.74 * (w / h)^0.67)

Where:

Z0 signifies the characteristic impedance

ε_eff denotes the effective dielectric constant of the PCB material

h embodies the height (thickness) of the PCB substrate

w represents the trace width

Impedance Control & Signal Integrity

The preceding discussion has illuminated the overarching role of impedance control in the realm of high-speed circuit signal integrity. Now, let’s delve into how this impedance control distinctly shapes the outcomes:

Reflections: Discrepancies in impedance can instigate signal reflections at junctures characterized by abrupt impedance shifts. These reflections, in turn, wield the potential to erode signal fidelity, culminating in the emergence of data errors.
Signal Deterioration: Impedance mismatches possess the capacity to sow the seeds of signal distortion, giving rise to phenomena like overshooting, undershooting, and oscillations. This aberration hampers the soundness of the transmitted signal.
Safeguarding Signal Integrity: The vulnerability of high-speed signals to extraneous noise and interference is a pressing concern. Impedance control acts as a vigilant sentinel, curtailing the trace’s susceptibility to external interferences and crosstalk. Through this vigilant guardianship, the designated signal’s integrity remains unmarred, ensconced in accuracy.

Thickness & Trace Width & Signal Propagation

The interconnection between substrate thickness, trace width, and the propagation of high-frequency signals is intrinsically interwoven with the underpinnings of the characteristic impedance formula. As the signal frequency scales up, the wavelength proportionally shrinks, casting a spotlight on the transmission line’s behavior.

For microstrip traces adorning a PCB, the ascending signal frequency necessitates a nuanced recalibration of the trace width. This calibration is imperative to preserve the coveted characteristic impedance, a parameter that orchestrates the harmonious dance of high-frequency signals along the trace pathway.

Layer Spacing

The influence of PCB thickness on the demarcation between signal layers and ground/power planes stems primarily from the necessity to uphold controlled impedance and curtail electromagnetic interference (EMI). In the realm of multilayer PCB, distinct layers undertake various roles, including signal transmission, power distribution, and EMI containment through grounding.

The partitioning between layers is intrinsically guided by the overall PCB thickness and the dielectric attributes of the chosen material. This layer spacing plays a pivotal role in taming crosstalk, ameliorating EMI emissions, and safeguarding signal fidelity.

Technical Considerations:

The spacing between layers is significantly governed by the dielectric constant (ε) of the PCB material and the coveted controlled impedance. In the context of microstrip traces (traces on external layers linked to a reference ground plane), the gap between the signal layer and the grounding plane exerts a marked influence on the effective dielectric constant, thereby orchestrating the controlled impedance.

To compute the effective dielectric constant (ε_eff) for microstrip traces, a simplified equation can be employed:

ε_eff = (ε_r + 1) / 2 + (ε_r – 1) / 2 * (1 / √(1 + 12 * h / w))

Where:

ε_r denotes the relative dielectric constant of the PCB material

h signifies the height (thickness) of the dielectric stratum between the trace and the grounding plane

w embodies the width of the trace

Significance of Layer Spacing for EMI Management:

Crosstalk Mitigation: A judicious gap between signal layers and ground/power planes assumes the mantle of crosstalk reduction. Crosstalk materializes when electromagnetic fields from adjacent traces intersect, eliciting degradation in signal quality. Apt spacing diminishes coupling among traces, a pivotal step in minimizing crosstalk.
EMI Emission Abatement: The tenet of preserving apt layer spacing dovetails into the quest for quelling electromagnetic interference emissions. In instances where signal layers are too proximate to each other or to power planes, uninvited electromagnetic radiation can be unleashed, potentially ushering in interferences with other components or devices.
Ground Plane Efficacy: Ground planes play the role of sentinels, fending off external electromagnetic fields and reining in internal EMI. A judicious gulf between signal layers and ground planes augments the shielding prowess, effectively corralling EMI within the PCB’s bounds.
Signal Integrity: Interplays amid traces traversing different layers hold sway over signal integrity. Prudent layer spacing guarantees that neighboring strata do not exert undue influence on signals, thereby sustaining their quality during transmission.

How to Choose PCB Thickness

Manufacturability and Process Constraints

The manufacturing processes wield a pivotal influence in defining the workable spectrum of PCB substrate thicknesses. PCB manufacturing process including etching, plating, and lamination, each marked by distinct constraints and requisites. To elaborate, the etching process dedicated to trace formation entails a dependable minimum width, while plating processes grapple with limitations in the aspect ratio (the ratio of thickness to width) of traces. Moreover, lamination entails the amalgamation of multiple layers, necessitating uniform thickness across the PCB to sustain controlled impedance and stave off warping.

It stands imperative that the selection of thickness aligns with the manufacturer’s PCB manufacturing capabilities, thereby ensuring fruitful production and peak performance. Should the chosen thickness veer towards the extremes of smallness or grandeur, manufacturing processes may stumble, giving rise to concerns like incomplete etching or scant plating coverage.

Though the specifics, replete with technical intricacies and mathematical formulations, might sway with the manufacturing process and PCB design, a simplified example elucidates the interplay of aspect ratio and trace plating:

Consider a widely acknowledged thumb rule: for dependable plating, the aspect ratio should hover around 1:1, signifying a proximity of trace thickness to width.

Aspect Ratio (AR) = PCB Thickness / Trace Width

Should the elected thickness yield a lofty aspect ratio, the attainment of uniform and trustworthy copper plating within traces might emerge as an uphill task. This discrepancy can engender shifts in trace impedance, signal erosion, and potential manufacturing anomalies. Conversely, an overly diminutive aspect ratio could trigger excessive plating, ushering in complexities during soldering and assembly.

Weight and Application Requirements

The thickness of a circuit board possesses a direct influence on the total weight of an electronic device. Boards with augmented thickness and an abundance of layers commonly carry more heft, courtesy of the supplementary material required for their crafting. The amalgam of core and prepreg materials, composing the layers, contributes to the cumulative weight. On occasions, the PCB’s weight can evolve into a pivotal consideration, notably within portable or lightweight devices, where weight wields design significance. Consequently, the pursuit of optimizing PCB thickness ascends in importance, orchestrating a harmonious equilibrium between electrical prowess and weight constraints.

Why do disparate applications call for varying thicknesses, and how do we unravel the paragon choice for each circumstance?

The process of ascertaining the pinnacle PCB thickness entails methodical contemplation of these variables. A systematic blueprint comprises:

Scrutiny of Prerequisites: Grasp the application’s precise requisites encompassing signal integrity, power handling, thermal governance, and mechanical steadfastness.
Electrical Simulation: Harness simulation tools to dissect the repercussions of assorted PCB thicknesses on signal integrity, impedance, and additional electrical parameters.
Thermal Evaluation: Gauge the adequacy of the chosen thickness in effectively dissipating heat, an especially critical facet in designs brimming with power density.
Mechanical Bounds: Confer attention upon the mechanical strain and mounting prerequisites of the contrivance, and gauge whether the chosen thickness furnishes requisite mechanical bolster.
Weight Considerations: Assay the weight prerequisites of the contraption and navigate a judicious path that strikes equilibrium between functionality and weight.
Manufacturing Viability: Ascertain that the chosen thickness harmonizes with the capabilities of the PCB manufacturing process.

Cost and Material Efficiency

Impact on Material Consumption and Cost Implications:

The thickness of a PCB exerts a direct influence on material consumption and associated expenditures. Boards of greater thickness necessitate a surplus of raw materials, encompassing core and prepreg layers. This gives rise not only to heightened material outlays but also exerts sway over fabrication and assembly expenses, attributable to protracted processing durations and the potential introduction of intricacies in the manufacturing sequence.

Further Reading: A Guide to Reducing PCB Project Costs!

Navigating Trade-offs and Striking Equilibrium:

The intricate interplay encompassing thickness, cost considerations, and performance entails the art of uncovering the most felicitous middle ground. Thinner PCBs could potentially yield savings in costs; however, this can occasion a compromise in mechanical robustness and the proficiency in diffusing heat. Contrarily, thicker PCBs could bolster performance metrics, albeit at an elevation of material and manufacturing outlays. Orchestrating a harmonious accord amid these variables mandates contemplation of design imperatives—signal integrity, power handling, thermal prerequisites, and mechanical steadfastness—while concurrently assessing the cost-efficient tenets inherent in a spectrum of thickness alternatives.

Common PCB Thickness

PCB Type	Thickness Range
Standard PCB
Single	1.6 mm(0.063inches)
Double	1.6 mm(0.063inches)
Multilayer	1.6 mm(0.063inches)
High Speed PCB
4-Layer	1.6 mm to 2.0 mm
6-Layer	2.0 mm to 2.4 mm
Flexible PCB
Single	0.1 mm to 0.25 mm
Double	0.15 mm to 0.3
HDI PCB
Range	0.4 to 1.2 mm

Conclusion

PCB thickness is like a puzzle piece that affects many important aspects of electronics. From being strong and reliable, to handling heat and keeping signals clear, its impact is wide-reaching. Finding the right thickness involves considering how the pieces fit together: strength, heat control, clear signals, avoiding interference, and making it in a way that works. When experts in design, engineering, and making things work together, they create a PCB that’s just right—strong, efficient, and tailored to do its job well in any device.

We'd love to hear from you